Specific Group Including Data Marginalized Group

Specific Group Including Data Marginalized Group

For this assignment you will select a marginalized group (veterans, minorities, individuals with disabilities, etc.) and write a paper of 1,750 to 2,100 words that can be used as a resource when working with an individual from the selected group. Use peer-reviewed resources to support your use of a specific career theory as well as interventions with this population. The paper should include the following:

  1. An explanation of who the population is and why it is important for this group to receive career counseling
  2. Statistics on the group (e.g., how large, how many have employment problems, how many utilize career counseling)
  3. Discussion of career counseling theory to be used with the group (e.g., Minnesota theory of work adjustment). Include evidence supporting the use of this theory in the general population as well as within the group. Please note: If none are available, it is important to indicate that as well.
  4. Basic plan for counseling utilizing chosen theory (e.g., interview, use of assessment tools, explanation of theory)
  5. Environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the client from finding work (e.g., disability, substance use history, felony, transportation, limited computer access)
  6. Local resources available to help the client obtain work (e.g., job center, training programs, support groups)
  7. Your conclusion on whether or not this plan is tenable and will work, based on the information listed above.
  8. A minimum of four scholarly references.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This assignment meets the following CACREP Standards:

2.F.4.a: Theories and models of career development, counseling, and decision making.

2.F.4.b. Approaches for conceptualizing the interrelationships among and between work, mental well-being, relationships, and other life roles and factors.

2.F.4.c. Processes for identifying and using career, avocational, educational, occupational and labor market information resources, technology, and information systems.

2.F.4.e. Strategies for assessing abilities, interests, values, personality and other factors that contribute to career development.

2.F.4.f. Strategies for career development program planning, organization, implementation, administration, and evaluation.

2.F.4.g. Strategies for advocating for diverse clients’ career and educational development and employment opportunities in a global economy.

2.F.4.h. Strategies for facilitating client skill development for career, educational, and life-work planning and management.

2.F.4.i. Methods of identifying and using assessment tools and techniques relevant to career planning and decision making.

2.F.4.j. Ethical and culturally relevant strategies for addressing career development.


RUBRIC

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%

3
Satisfactory
75.00%

4
Good
85.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

10.0 %An explanation of the population and why it is important they receive career counseling

Paper does not include an explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why it is important they should receive career counseling. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper only vaguely or incompletely includes an explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why it is important they should receive career counseling. Only briefly mentions the population of interest without explanation of the importance of career counseling Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a basic explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why it is important they should receive career counseling. Population of interest is mentioned as well as the importance of career counseling with this population. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a thorough explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why it is important they should receive career counseling. Thorough discussion of the population, and specific problems that may be resolved with career counseling are included. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper provides a comprehensive explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why it is important they should receive career counseling. Thorough discussion of the population, and specific problems that may be resolved with career counseling are well supported with scholarly resources. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

10.0 %Statistics on the group

Paper does not include statistics on the selected group. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper only vaguely or incompletely includes statistics on the selected group. Almost no statistics are mentioned on the group of interest. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a basic statistics on the selected group. Two primary statistics are mentioned but not explained in depth. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper provides thorough statistics on the selected group. Three or more statistics are mentioned and explained in depth. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper provides comprehensive statistics on the selected group. Three or more statistics are mentioned and explained. Resources for statistics are evaluated as scholarly. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

10.0 %A discussion of the career counseling theory to be used with the group.

Paper does not include a discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected group. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper only vaguely or incompletely includes a discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected group. Theory is mentioned but not explained. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a basic discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected group. Theory is mentioned and explained. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a thorough discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected group. Theory is mentioned and explained thoroughly. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper provides a comprehensive discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected group. Theory is mentioned and explained thoroughly, supported by statistics regarding the application to this specific group. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

10.0 %A basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the chosen theory

Paper does not include a discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the chosen theory. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper only vaguely or incompletely includes a discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the chosen theory. A plan is mentioned but undeveloped. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a basic discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the chosen theory. A plan is mentioned and developed basically. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a thorough discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the chosen theory. A plan is developed thoroughly. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper provides a comprehensive discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the chosen theory. A plan is developed thoroughly or the application to this specific group including data supporting plan efficacy. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

10.0 %Environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the client from finding work (e.g., disability, substance use history, felony, transportation, limited computer access)

Paper does not include a discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the client from finding work. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper only vaguely or incompletely includes a discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the client from finding work. Barriers are mentioned but not analyzed. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a basic discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the client from finding work. Barriers are mentioned and analyzed briefly. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a thorough discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the client from finding work. Barriers are mentioned and analyzed thoroughly but are general and can apply to any group. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper provides a comprehensive discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the client from finding work. Barriers are analyzed thoroughly and appear to apply to this group specifically. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

10.0 %Local resources available to help the client obtain work (e.g., job center, training programs, support groups)

Paper does not include a discussion about the local resources available to help the client obtain work. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper only vaguely or incompletely includes a discussion about the local resources available to help the client obtain work. Resources are mentioned but not explored. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a basic discussion about the local resources available to help the client obtain work. Resources are mentioned but not discussed, contact information is provided. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a thorough discussion about the local resources available to help the client obtain work. Resources are mentioned and discussed, contact information is provided. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper provides a comprehensive discussion about the local resources available to help the client obtain work. Resources specifically target for this group are mentioned and discussed, contact information is provided. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

10.0 %Provide your own opinion on whether this plan is tenable and if you think if it can work

Paper does not include a discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Paper only vaguely or incompletely includes a discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Opinion is provided but does not reflect the information provided in the paper. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a basic discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Opinion is provided and is supported by the work in the body of the paper. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Paper provides a thorough discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Opinion is provided, supported by the paper and is reasonably accurate with regard to potential efficacy. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Paper provides a comprehensive discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Opinion is provided and includes both supports and limitations as outlined in the body of the paper. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

15.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

For this assignment you will select a marginalized group (veterans, minorities, individuals with disabilities, etc.) and write a paper of 1,750 to 2,100 words that can be used as a

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order your essay today and save 7% with the discount code ESSAYHELP7